Surveillance procurement
5 documents on file, spanning 2019–2025. The chain below starts with the original agreement; each document beneath it shows what it changed.
What the governing body was told before it voted, what it actually enacted, and what was signed — term by term. Click any value to read the passage it came from. A row marked silent is not a disagreement: it means only some of the three sources address that term at all, which is a different criticism and sometimes a fairer one.
| Term | Staff report | Enactment | Contract | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cost | — | Differs | ||
| Addresses data sharing | — | — | Silent |
No source addresses: data retention, plate readers, annual cost, term, renews automatically, sharing with others, addresses federal access. Neither the briefing, the enactment nor the agreement puts these on the record.
Not on file: enactment. No ordinance or resolution authorising this contract has been located, so what the governing body approved cannot be compared against what was signed. That is a statement about the record we hold, not a finding that no vote occurred.
| Term | Staff report | Enactment | Contract | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total cost | — | — | Silent | |
| Addresses data sharing | — | — | Silent |
No source addresses: data retention, plate readers, annual cost, term, renews automatically, sharing with others, addresses federal access. Neither the briefing, the enactment nor the agreement puts these on the record.
Not on file: enactment. No ordinance or resolution authorising this contract has been located, so what the governing body approved cannot be compared against what was signed. That is a statement about the record we hold, not a finding that no vote occurred.
| Term | Staff report | Enactment | Contract | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Addresses data sharing | — | — | Silent |
No source addresses: data retention, plate readers, total cost, annual cost, term, renews automatically, sharing with others, addresses federal access. Neither the briefing, the enactment nor the agreement puts these on the record.
2 systems named in this jurisdiction’s procurement documents, 1 of which is documented as integrating with FlockOS. Plate readers are one layer; what a camera network is worth to an agency depends on what it is plugged into.
“S 190.00 DOUGLAS DOWNS VETTED SECURITY SOLUTIONS 0.00 18.00 14.00 22.00 9.00 0.00 63.00 3 FLOCK SAFETY 185.85 CLAUDE SHELTON VETTED SECURITY SOLUTIONS 0.00 19.00 10.00 20.00 9.00 0.00 58.00 4”the document
“0.00 $5,400.00 PSG-02340-001 AXIS P1465-LE 29MM (LE) $0.00 12.00 $0.00 $0.00 PSG-SCT-1Y Rekor Scout (1 year) $780.00 12.00 $9,360.00 $9,360.00 PSG-COM-1Y Rekor Cellular Service Plan (1 ye”the document
These are the systems named in the procurement documents we hold. A system listed here was written down in a document this jurisdiction published; that is not the same as a finding that the jurisdiction operates it, and a system missing from this list may simply have been bought under an item we have not read.
A gap means the record was not found on the jurisdiction's public portal. It is not a statement that the record does not exist, and it is not a statement about whether the jurisdiction operates ALPR.
Source portal: https://lauderhill-fl.legistar.com. Last swept 2026-08-31.