Surveillance procurement
2 documents on file, spanning 2025. The chain below starts with the original agreement; each document beneath it shows what it changed.
What the governing body was told before it voted, what it actually enacted, and what was signed — term by term. Click any value to read the passage it came from. A row marked silent is not a disagreement: it means only some of the three sources address that term at all, which is a different criticism and sometimes a fairer one.
Not on file: enactment. No ordinance or resolution authorising this contract has been located, so what the governing body approved cannot be compared against what was signed. That is a statement about the record we hold, not a finding that no vote occurred.
| Term | Staff report | Enactment | Contract | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sharing with others | — | Differs | ||
| Data retention | — | Agree | ||
| Plate readers | — | — | Silent | |
| Addresses data sharing | — | — | Silent | |
| Addresses federal access | — | — | Silent |
No source addresses: total cost, annual cost, term, renews automatically. Neither the briefing, the enactment nor the agreement puts these on the record.
Not on file: enactment. No ordinance or resolution authorising this contract has been located, so what the governing body approved cannot be compared against what was signed. That is a statement about the record we hold, not a finding that no vote occurred.
| Term | Staff report | Enactment | Contract | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Addresses federal access | — | Agree | ||
| Data retention | — | — | Silent | |
| Addresses data sharing | — | — | Silent | |
| Sharing with others | — | — | Silent |
No source addresses: plate readers, total cost, annual cost, term, renews automatically. Neither the briefing, the enactment nor the agreement puts these on the record.
1 system named in this jurisdiction’s procurement documents, 1 of which is documented as integrating with FlockOS. Plate readers are one layer; what a camera network is worth to an agency depends on what it is plugged into.
“. FISCAL IMPACT OPD intends to utilize $2,252,000 (over 2 years) in City funding for Flock Safety software and hardware products. OPD has $1,500,000 authorized to utilize for funding Fl”the document
These are the systems named in the procurement documents we hold. A system listed here was written down in a document this jurisdiction published; that is not the same as a finding that the jurisdiction operates it, and a system missing from this list may simply have been bought under an item we have not read.
A gap means the record was not found on the jurisdiction's public portal. It is not a statement that the record does not exist, and it is not a statement about whether the jurisdiction operates ALPR.
Source portal: https://oakland.legistar.com. Last swept 2026-08-31.