Surveillance procurement
3 documents on file, spanning 2019–2023. The chain below starts with the original agreement; each document beneath it shows what it changed.
What the governing body was told before it voted, what it actually enacted, and what was signed — term by term. Click any value to read the passage it came from. A row marked silent is not a disagreement: it means only some of the three sources address that term at all, which is a different criticism and sometimes a fairer one.
Not on file: staff report, enactment. No ordinance or resolution authorising this contract has been located, so what the governing body approved cannot be compared against what was signed. That is a statement about the record we hold, not a finding that no vote occurred.
| Term | Staff report | Enactment | Contract | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data retention | — | — | Silent | |
| Plate readers | — | — | Silent | |
| Total cost | — | — | Silent | |
| Annual cost | — | — | Silent | |
| Renews automatically | — | — | Silent | |
| Addresses data sharing | — | — | Silent | |
| Addresses federal access | — | — | Silent |
No source addresses: term, sharing with others. Neither the briefing, the enactment nor the agreement puts these on the record.
Not on file: staff report, enactment. No ordinance or resolution authorising this contract has been located, so what the governing body approved cannot be compared against what was signed. That is a statement about the record we hold, not a finding that no vote occurred.
| Term | Staff report | Enactment | Contract | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plate readers | — | — | Silent | |
| Annual cost | — | — | Silent | |
| Term | — | — | Silent | |
| Addresses data sharing | — | — | Silent | |
| Sharing with others | — | — | Silent | |
| Addresses federal access | — | — | Silent |
No source addresses: data retention, total cost, renews automatically. Neither the briefing, the enactment nor the agreement puts these on the record.
Not on file: staff report, enactment. No ordinance or resolution authorising this contract has been located, so what the governing body approved cannot be compared against what was signed. That is a statement about the record we hold, not a finding that no vote occurred.
| Term | Staff report | Enactment | Contract | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sharing with others | — | — | Silent |
No source addresses: data retention, plate readers, total cost, annual cost, term, renews automatically, addresses data sharing, addresses federal access. Neither the briefing, the enactment nor the agreement puts these on the record.
2 systems named in this jurisdiction’s procurement documents, 1 of which is documented as integrating with FlockOS. Plate readers are one layer; what a camera network is worth to an agency depends on what it is plugged into.
“Flock Safety + CA - Manteca PD ______________ Flock Group Inc. 1170 Howell Mill Rd, Suite 210 Atla”the document
“hank you again for the opportunity. Sincerely, Steve Adair Reginal Sales Manager LEHR Vigilant Solutions Partner 2/28/2019 It is our great privilege to have had the opportunity to present to”the document
These are the systems named in the procurement documents we hold. A system listed here was written down in a document this jurisdiction published; that is not the same as a finding that the jurisdiction operates it, and a system missing from this list may simply have been bought under an item we have not read.
A gap means the record was not found on the jurisdiction's public portal. It is not a statement that the record does not exist, and it is not a statement about whether the jurisdiction operates ALPR.
Source portal: https://manteca-ca.legistar.com. Last swept 2026-08-31.